Jason Cabinda slams Jason Whitlock for his erroneous view on the Detroit Lions

Jason Cabinda criticizes Jason Whitlock for his erroneous view on the Detroit Lions.

The fallout from the contentious 2-point conversion call in the Detroit Lions-Dallas Cowboys game continues, with Jason Cabinda harshly condemning sports pundit Jason Whitlock for his remarks on the situation.

Whitlock’s Take on the Controversy

Jason Whitlock expressed his thoughts on the Lions’ tactics at important periods of their game versus the Cowboys on social media. He contended that the Lions were not victims, but rather the architects of their own demise.

“The Lions were successful in creating confusion.” “Three linemen — 58, 68, and 70 — all walk/run toward the ref,” Jason Whitlock tweeted.”How many Lions does it take to report one eligible lineman?” 68 required 58’s personal escort? 70 went onto the field and made a beeline for the ref, as if he was reporting eligible, as he did earlier in the game. The stadium is really noisy. Three men approach you. One of them (70) makes a quick hand signal as if he’s reporting. Ref declares 70 to be reporting eligible. Lions are not helpless. Dan Campbell desired and received confusion. After the penalty, he should have kicked the XP. Dan Campbell made a mistake.”

Cabinda’s Strong Response

In response to Whitlock’s judgment, Jason Cabinda called it one of the “laziest takes” he’s ever seen. Cabinda emphasized the strategic importance in football of avoiding making one’s intentions clear to the opposition defense, especially on crucial plays like a 2-point convert.

“Gotta be one of the laziest takes I’ve seen,” Cabinda said to Whitlock. “Anyone who really knows football and knows about plays like this knows that sending only one OL to the referee for a 2 pt conversion where the defense is stagnant and can see everything going on is like telling on yourself pre-snap.”

Bottom Line