Colts’ Backfield Dilemma: Taylor and Moss’s relative positions for the remainder of the 2023 season

Examining the strategic decisions made by the Indianapolis Colts, led by Shane Steichen and Chris Ballard, in using Jonathan Taylor and Zack Moss.

As the 2023 season goes on, the Indianapolis Colts find themselves at a critical crossroads. In light of Zack Moss’s rise to prominence and Jonathan Taylor’s injury-plagued 2022 season, which resulted in a contract standoff and eventual extension, general manager Chris Ballard and head coach Shane Steichen must make a crucial choice regarding their backfield management.

Jonathan Taylor was the NFL’s most prolific rusher in 2021. His supremacy gave people hope for the future. But in 2022, ankle problems ruined his impressive start, necessitating off-season surgery. While guaranteeing Taylor’s financial future, the ensuing contract standoff and resolution unintentionally created opportunities for Zack Moss. Moss has established himself as one of the NFL’s most effective running backs in 2023.

Ballard and Steichen have a lot to think about now that Anthony Richardson, a rookie quarterback, has had his season cut short and the early success is fading. Is it better to keep Taylor healthy going forward or go back to using him as a bell cow on every play?

Whether he is signed as a complement or adds value through a trade or draft pick, Moss has proven he can shoulder the weight and is becoming more valuable, which might help the Colts.

An indication of the Colts’ approach was clear in their most recent encounter with the New Orleans Saints. Taylor’s use drastically decreased in the second half, with only one rush, after he gained 94 yards on 11 carries in the first half. Coach Steichen blamed this on “game script,” but the circumstances didn’t really support this theory. It would have made sense to continue relying on the Colts’ excellent running game with the game close and the team leading in time of possession.

The offensive scheme becoming more pass-heavy and Moss receiving more carries, however, may point to a tactical change in direction. In order to keep both backs healthy, the Colts may choose a more balanced approach, even though injuries or changes in performance could have an impact.

There are various possible advantages to this strategy. By lessening the strain on Jonathan Taylor, it protects his long-term well-being and productivity. It gives Zack Moss more chances to develop and flourish, which could raise his worth. Additionally, it produces a dynamic backfield that can confuse defenses.

This tactic is not risk-free, though. It might make it more difficult for Taylor to get back into top shape and rhythm. Additionally, an even split might restrict the offensive possibilities of the Colts, particularly in crucial game scenarios where Taylor’s demonstrated abilities could be pivotal.

The Colts’ ability to manage their backfield will determine whether they succeed or fail as the season goes on. In addition to determining how the 2023 season plays out, Shane Steichen and Chris Ballard’s choices will have long-term effects on the team.

The Colts are forced to navigate treacherous waters while striking a balance between their immediate needs and long-term goals. Whether Zack Moss keeps improving or Jonathan Taylor takes back his leading role, the Indianapolis Colts’ backfield plan will make for an exciting narrative as the season progresses.